The Red-Line Theory of Naval Warfare
Posted by Lurch on September 24, 2006 • Comments (4)Permalink

Idiosynchronic – who posts at some of the most interesting places - has a short piece up at Progressive Historians.

What's a Redline Event and Will It Be Justification?

For those with limited imagination, a “red-line event” is a case of having the “double dog dare ya to step over that line” challenge met.

. . all the military analysis I've read indicates that Iran has a fair number of cruise missiles salted away in a fairly wide-ranging tunnel/cave system along their coast.

These papers also imply that Iran's stock of missiles is fairly effective vs. current defensive systems. It seems like they could release a sufficient quantity of munitions to damage, possibly even sink a carrier.

My recollection is fuzzy, but isn't sinking a carrier one of our redlines for nuclear release?

You should probably go read Idiosynchronic’s discussion of this possibility.

Comments

Posted by: Gordon at September 25, 2006 07:37 PM

Someone in the Navy should look at a map and see what's on the east side of the gulf. There's good reason why it's called the 'Persian' Gulf.

Posted by: Seven of Six at September 25, 2006 10:50 PM

This was the introduction page Idio had at our site for Progressive Historians.

Posted by: Lurch at September 26, 2006 04:23 AM

Gordon, you might be right, but I'm sure our tactical and operational planners have considered the facts you point out. As was mentioned in the original post, these facts might well have been considered in the planning, as hard as that is to believe.

Posted by: Lurch at September 26, 2006 04:26 AM

As I said, SoS, Idio posts in some pretty interesting places.

Post a comment




Remember Me?