Global Warming
Posted by Lurch on December 10, 2006 • Comments (5)TrackBack (0)Permalink

Most of the world has accepted the idea of global warming as a real threat and is trying to come to grips with strategies to keep Inuits in Alaska from having to buy swimsuits. Perhaps I should have written “most of the civilized world” to make allowance for Senator James Inhofe (R-11th century) who thinks it’s all a lot of science-based hooey. As we all know, science has a strong liberal bias.

Inhofe has made a virtual hobby out of using questionable science to support his agenda on climate change. Last December in Milan, Italy, at an annual UN meeting of parties to the 1992 Framework Convention on Climate Change, Inhofe distributed a brochure titled "The Facts and Science of Climate Change," which plugged the Soon and Baliunas study[financed in large part by the American Petroleum Institute.] Inhofe's document largely rehashed a July 2003 Senate floor speech he delivered, which concluded with a stunning line. "With all of the hysteria, all of the fear, all of the phony science," Inhofe said, "could it be that man-made global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people? It sure sounds like it."


In a bizarre development, some scientists and ministers in the UK have banded together to join the fight on global warming.

AT LAST, evidence that global warming is a load of hot air. Cow flatulence has attracted the attention of ministers after emerging as an environmental menace to rival factory chimneys, Chelsea tractors and cheap air travel.

Bovine emissions account for around one million tonnes of methane a year in the UK and now the government wants farmers to change what they feed the animals to cut down greenhouse gases.

Scientists have already conducted experiments on different cattle feed to determine which one best cuts down gaseous after-effects, and ministers have not ruled out action to force farmers to change their cows' diet.

Officials have worked out that agriculture contributes 7% of all the UK's greenhouse gas emissions. The sector accounts for 36% of Britain's emissions of methane, and farm animals - chiefly cows - contribute the vast majority of it.

The problem is worse in Scotland, which has a higher concentration of agriculture, meaning farm animals produce 46% of methane emissions.

The solution is a new formulation of cow feed that will steeply limit the methane produced by British cows.

Since it’s Sunday I will avoid some of the obvious jokes that are possible. And trying to avoid jokes when writing about Jim Inhofe and things coming out of the south end of a cow is very hard to do.

I feel quite noble and very family-friendly.


Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.mainandcentral.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/146

Comments

Posted by: Killer Whale at December 10, 2006 04:09 PM


It would be nice if we could contain the bovine emissions that come out of Inhofe.

Where is Hannibal Lechter when you really need him?

Posted by: Lurch at December 10, 2006 04:40 PM

I think would be nice to contain the emissions from all of them. But what do I know? I'm just a logical, science-loving Progressive.

Posted by: Gordon at December 11, 2006 04:29 PM

Oklahoma is an oil state, and Inhofe is bought and paid for in their big bucks campaign to slow down rationality in the burning of dead dinosaurs. Besides just being an idiot.

Posted by: drtomaso at December 11, 2006 05:11 PM

The rash of anti-intellectualism going on in this country is frightening. What happened to the cold war era when we had to have the best tech, the best scientists, etc?

Whether its global warming, stem cell research, or evolution, the conservatives of this country would much rather follow some idiot in a black frock and collar than the guys and gals in white lab coats. They dont seem to mind that it will virtually guarantee us third world status as our jobs flee to countries willing to properly educate their youth.

Posted by: Lurch at December 11, 2006 11:52 PM

Let's remember that "conservative" by definition means reactionary, adherence to the old ways. The desire to crawl back into the past - could that mean the childood when life was safe because you were protected by mother and father? We can see that those who have taken that title to describe themselves piss themselves daily in fear of outsiders.

Today's "conservatives" are many things, but one of them most likely is advocates for an economic strata resembling the Middle Ages, with a small elite crust ruling over a vast lumpenproletariat of serfs. The Corporate State is soulless and your worst nightmares coulldn't grasp the totality of what is possible.

Post a comment




Remember Me?