Making ACUs More Comforting
Posted by Lurch on November 28, 2007 • Comments (0)TrackBack (0)Permalink

The Army is fixing a problem with their newest uniforms and it’s a good thing.

WASHINGTON — The Army is retrofitting 1 million uniforms to bolster pants that have been tearing during the rigors of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Soldiers in Iraq began reporting "crotch durability problems" with their combat uniforms in July 2005, according to the Army. Jumping into Humvees, hopping from helicopters and scrambling after insurgents have popped inseams on the baggy pants.

Rougher terrain in Afghanistan prompted complaints this past August from soldiers who said their uniforms gave out quickly.

"This is a result of soldiers working in steep and harsh terrain and literally sliding down steep hills and mountains," Army spokesman Sheldon Smith said in an e-mail.

Single-stitching has caused most of the blown-out inseams, said Erin Thomas, an Army spokeswoman. The new trousers are more durable, she said.

There has to be nothing worse than crawling around the rocks of Afghanistan with a ripped crotch in your ACUs. I speak from experience when I tell you that that 1/100th of an inch of fabric covering GI Joe may not be bullet-proof but when it’s torn you no longer think of that one bullet with your name on it. You become convinced every bullet is engraved with the name of your best friend and his two sidekicks.

A torn uniform inseam is no laughing matter, said Loren Thompson, a military analyst at the Lexington Institute, a defense think tank.

"Any well-made uniform should maintain its stitch in virtually all combat situations except direct fire," he said. "It is a serious problem if it becomes a distraction to the war fighter who needs to concentrate on completing a mission."

The Army unveiled its current combat uniform in 2004. It has a digital camouflage pattern and pockets that can be reached while wearing body armor. The half-cotton, half-nylon uniform is supposed to last six months. U.S. plants make hundreds of thousands of them a month.

Soldiers deploying to Iraq and Afghanistan receive two sets of combat uniforms and two sets of fire-resistant ones. By January, all of the uniforms soldiers receive will be made of fire-resistant material.

I no longer have my jungle fatigues of course, but I think the seams were double-stitched. I don’t claim to having a perfect memory because, you know, white hair and all that, so I wonder whatever possessed procurement managers to not put that little item into the specifications?

Props to the Army for creating the uniforms with fire-resistant material, although it’s probably tragic they didn’t take that step from the beginning. Flame is an automatic side effect of combat involving motorized vehicles. Aviators and tankers uniforms are made from Nomex® fiber – why not GIs who are automatically associated with vehicles in today’s mechanized Army?

I've said it before, and it bears repeating: ALL Army procurement boards should have lower-rank EM on them. Colonels are too busy thinking about their retirement double-dip job with a DoD vendor to think enough about the troops.

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.mainandcentral.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/918

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?